Talk:Alan Cooper

Cooper (company) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 14 July 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Alan Cooper. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human–Computer Interaction (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Human–Computer InteractionWikipedia:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionTemplate:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionHuman–Computer Interaction articles

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alan Cooper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060504011043/http://www.computergenome.com/blastfromthepast/CBasic.asp to http://www.computergenome.com/blastfromthepast/CBasic.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alan Cooper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081210082733/http://www.thebradbrooksshow.com/Guests/aug-31-2008-alan-cooper-the-inmates-are-running-the-asylum.html to http://thebradbrooksshow.com/Guests/aug-31-2008-alan-cooper-the-inmates-are-running-the-asylum.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone explain "Inmates" title?

I picked up a copy of "Inmates". That is quite a provocative title. As the author points out, engineers are not normal. But who is crazy? It seems to me that the managers are crazy for thinking that they will get better results by delaying the project start and then spending only 3 months on engineering. The engineers are quite sane for ignoring problems they have no control over.

Requested move 23 November 2024

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

– Alan Cooper is not (or no longer) the primary topic. Alan Cooper (biblical scholar) has 2/3 the page views of the software designer. Throw in all the other Alan Coopers that there are, and the software designer gets a bit more than 50% of the views. Therefore, WP:PTOPIC is not met. Schwede 66 02:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~@Schwede66 I think this can be closed as uncontroversial if you do not mind. There is no reason to contest this.~~ ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 06:47, 23 November 2024 (UTC) Never mind![reply]

I don’t mind at all. I've moved articles that I thought were even more straightforward and got moaned at big time. Hence the formal process. Schwede 66 07:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose - for the following, (1) long term significance shows 58% support for this Alan, but even more so when you remove the extremely short term spikes of interest it is more like 64% -- however beyond that is (2) the software designer is a more developed article (20k v 4k in size); (3) There are significantly more inbound links (213 vs 22); (4) Wikinav shows no data for the DAB page, however for the software designer, of the 1.4k incoming page views just 20 (or 1.5%) sought the DAB page for (presumably) landing in the wrong place; (5) Reviewing Google Ngram, Books, Scholar, News, and Trend all seem to significantly favor the software designer over all others; (6) the software engineer has been translated into 14 other languages showing a broader appeal... However, even with all that said, I would agree that there isn't that overwhelming 80% that some people would prefer in any given area, but I would proffer that the preponderance of leanings in many of the WP:DPT criteria would lean towards keeping it as is. TiggerJay (talk) 07:48, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I agree there is no clear primary topic. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Disambiguation is warranted. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]