Talk:Consciousness
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Consciousness article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Consciousness was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This level-3 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled
[edit]Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.
Philosophy of mind
[edit]Removed uncitated sources saying default is historical one.added source citated showing dominant position in philosophy of mind is physicalism Orexin (talk) 05:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
GA concerns
[edit]I am concerned that this article doesn't follow the good article criteria anymore. Some of my concerns are highlighted below:
- There is a lot of uncited text throughout the article.
- There are some sections that rely upon block quotes. This creates copyright concerns and increases the word count. This information might be better as summarised prose.
- The article, at over 11,000 words, is above the recommended length at WP:TOOBIG. I think this might be a sign that this is too detailed. I think removing most of the block quotes will resolve this, but the article should be edited for too much detail.
- The lead does not summarise all major aspects of the article.
Is anyone interested in fixing up this article or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 18:52, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:25, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
There is a lot of uncited text throughout the article. Some sections rely upon block quotes, which create copyright concerns, make the text more difficult to read, and increase the word count. This information might be better summarized in prose. The article, at over 11,000 words, is above the recommended length at WP:TOOBIG, I think summarising most of the block quotes will resolve this, but I think information can be spun out. The lead does not summarise all major aspects of the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Phlsph7: you're our foremost expert(/masochist) at crafting articles on these large, philosophical concepts. No pressure to participate in this process, but just flagging it in case it piqued your interest. Ajpolino (talk) 18:01, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping. I agree with the points raised by Z1720. The lead covers only the problem of definition and there are several unreferenced passages and unnecessary quotes that should be replaced by regular prose. These points could be addressed in the scope of the GAR, but given the length of the article, this is not a quick fix. Phlsph7 (talk) 13:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree about the length, although I would not flunk it on just this basis if the reference issues were resolved.
- Also, whatever the outcome of the rating reassessment, rewriting the lead would be a major improvement to the article. I'm not volunteering, but I think it would be possible to do a pretty good job in less than an hour.
- If no one takes this on during the GAR, maybe consider sharing on the talk page? It's not often you encounter an active solicitation to rewrite the lead of such a general article. Someone will step up. Patrick (talk) 16:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Patrick Welsh: GARs are transcluded onto article talk pages, so this information will be there. You could also start a new section for the lead on the talk page, as it might lead to collaboration. Z1720 (talk) 17:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- C-Class level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- C-Class neuroscience articles
- Top-importance neuroscience articles
- C-Class Epilepsy articles
- Mid-importance Epilepsy articles
- WikiProject Epilepsy articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- High-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class philosophy of science articles
- High-importance philosophy of science articles
- Philosophy of science task force articles
- C-Class philosophy of mind articles
- High-importance philosophy of mind articles
- Philosophy of mind task force articles
- C-Class Analytic philosophy articles
- High-importance Analytic philosophy articles
- Analytic philosophy task force articles
- C-Class Continental philosophy articles
- High-importance Continental philosophy articles
- Continental philosophy task force articles
- C-Class Modern philosophy articles
- High-importance Modern philosophy articles
- Modern philosophy task force articles
- C-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- High-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles
- C-Class psychology articles
- Top-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles