Jump to content

Talk:Erosion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Erosion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 December 2019

[edit]

can I please edit on this page. I can make Wikipedia a lot better if you let me edit. thank you for reading my request. 86.142.243.21 (talk) 08:55, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. MadGuy7023 (talk) 12:15, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 September 2021

[edit]

Remove a paragraph break within a sentence: "[...]distinguished from a rill based

on a critical cross-sectional[...]" Ndesprez (talk) 11:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done: Thanks. Eevee01(talk) 12:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Freeze-thaw erosion appears to be missing from this article.

[edit]

Erosion is not really ye field so I'd prefer someone more knowledgeable to add freeze-thaw erosion to this article. For example doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201901.019. entitled "Research progress on the effects of freeze-thaw on soil physical and chemical properties and wind and water erosion" says in it's abstract "Freeze-thaw erosion, one of the main types of soil erosion, is widely distributed in China.". Even a mention of it would be good. I was gong to reference the erosion article from another I am assembling on freeze-fracture but it won't make sense to reference the erosion article if there is no reference to freeze thaw erosion. If I don't hear back from anyone soon I will presume no-one is currently editing the erosion article and may then add a sentence or two myself if no-one objects. Thanks. Tgru001 (talk) 20:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Freeze-thaw is probably absent from this article about erosion because it has been included in the weathering and frost weathering articles instead (weathering being the in situ decomposition of rocky material, erosion being the subsequent movement/removal of the weathered material). By the way, freeze-thaw is also not included in the more detailed soil erosion article. This might be a language/terminology problem, with people incorrectly assuming that weathering and erosion are synonyms in English. A search for "freeze-thaw erosion" in academic journals via Google Scholar gives only 882 hits, almost all of them by a small group of Chinese scientists. GeoWriter (talk) 23:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pirunpesa

[edit]

It's not immediately clear what the Pirunpesa image is doing in the glaciers section. The (confusing) article on this feature makes greater reference to glacial deposition (hole filled with glacially transported materials) than erosion. In the absence of clear information, I'm assuming it may have been formed not by ice per se, but by glacial meltwater - perhaps subglacially? cheers Geopersona (talk) 07:36, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]